If you've followed my previous posts, you might have picked up on my… let's call it a nuanced relationship with "society." It's a curious dichotomy: in real life, I'm generally accepted, actively participate, and try to live by my own principles. I get along well with people and thrive within the social fabric. Yet, a fundamental friction persists.

Perhaps it's because I've never quite fit the Mold. However, I've found my usefulness (which, in my book, is a key point of existence). I offer respect, and in return, I'm valued for what I bring. This understanding stems from a crucial early lesson, courtesy of my insightful parents: "societal rules," while varying wildly, often seem designed to hinder individual potential. The adage "pleasing everyone is an impossible goal" (hello, opinions – a recurring theme here) rings true. Hence, the polite societal guidelines I've shared before (even ones I occasionally bend myself, depending on the context). As long as you're polite and adhere to basic rules, you'll likely avoid major conflict. The "problems" people have with you often reflect their own internal struggles, a projection rather than a genuine understanding of who you are.

Let me reiterate societies, in their inherent structure, often seem predisposed to create challenges, highlighting life's inherent difficulties and the near impossibility of meeting external expectations. Even those who champion the rules often fail to uphold them consistently – I've witnessed this firsthand.

My "problem" isn't necessarily with individuals, but with the often-unexamined and inconsistently applied rules of the game. I've actively tested these boundaries, engaged with their proponents, and discovered a startling truth: many who preach societal norms lack a fundamental understanding of their origins or even their basic tenets.

We often forget that society is built from individuals. A collection of individuals forms a community, communities shape a society, and societies constitute a nation. To address societal issues, we must delve into the foundational pillars to pinpoint where things went awry. My experimental nature has led to its share of problems, transforming me into an almost obsessive researcher of truth. The revelation? Many "rule-makers" simply don't know why the rules exist. And if they don't know, can we truly blame them for their projections? My "problem" then becomes the problem of unspoken, unexamined norms.

Perhaps, on a deeper level, this is a trauma response – a reaction to the often-unexamined assumptions of others. Where I might have once tried to bridge the gap, I eventually stopped. The silver lining? This journey has inadvertently equipped me with a practical "handbook" of human behaviour, categorizing the diverse individuals I've encountered. Audience behaviour, anyone? (Couldn't resist a little marketing tie-in – wouldn't be me otherwise!).